SADAMHUSEN MURTUJABHAI KALOLIYA vs LUHAR FAISAL FIROZBHAI Advocate - S S DUBEY — 1729/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 11th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040027312024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1729/2024

Filing Date

19-07-2024

Registration No

1729/2024

Registration Date

19-07-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

SADAMHUSEN MURTUJABHAI KALOLIYA

Adv. S M MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

LUHAR FAISAL FIROZBHAI Advocate - S S DUBEY

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

11-05-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1729/2024 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halol Parties: Sadamhusen Murtujabhai Kaloliya (Complainant) v. Luhar Faisal Firozbhai (Accused) Charge: Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 Decision: The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and fine of ₹1,49,800 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court directed that ₹1,39,800 from the fine amount be paid to the complainant as compensation. The accused's defense that he had repaid only ₹10,000 borrowed (not the full ₹1,20,000 claimed) and that the check was misused was rejected as it failed to rebut the statutory presumption favoring the complainant under the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1729/2024 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halol Parties: Sadamhusen Murtujabhai Kaloliya (Complainant) v. Luhar Faisal Firozbhai (Accused) Charge: Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 Decision: The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and fine of ₹1,49,800 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court directed that ₹1,39,800 from the fine amount be paid to the complainant as compensation. The accused's defense that he had repaid only ₹10,000 borrowed (not the full ₹1,20,000 claimed) and that the check was misused was rejected as it failed to rebut the statutory presumption favoring the complainant under the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case