MAHESHBHAI T. DOLTANI vs MOHAMAD HANIF AHMAD CHANDA Advocate - L S PARMAR — 1319/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM020020562024

Filing Number

1319/2024

Filing Date

16-Apr-2024

Registration No

1319/2024

Registration Date

16-Apr-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT GODHRA

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI T. DOLTANI

    Adv. A A SAMTANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMAD HANIF AHMAD CHANDA Advocate - L S PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 1319/2024 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godhra Parties: Maheshbhai T. Doltani (Petitioner) v. Mohamad Hanif Ahmad Chanda (Respondent) Charge: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 Decision: The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to 2 years simple imprisonment with an order to compensate the complainant ₹1,50,000 within 30 days, or face an additional 45 days imprisonment. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the cheque bouncing offense: the accused issued a cheque for repayment of a loan, it was dishonored due to insufficient funds, proper notice was given, and payment was not made within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 27-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  16. 01-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  17. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  19. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  20. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  21. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 23-Oct-2024

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 21-Sep-2024

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 03-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 22-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 16-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1319/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1319/2024 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godhra Parties: Maheshbhai T. Doltani (Petitioner) v. Mohamad Hanif Ahmad Chanda (Respondent) Charge: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 Decision: The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to 2 years simple imprisonment with an order to compensate the complainant ₹1,50,000 within 30 days, or face an additional 45 days imprisonment. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the cheque bouncing offense: the accused issued a cheque for repayment of a loan, it was dishonored due to insufficient funds, proper notice was given, and payment was not made within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case