Government of Gujarat vs BHIKHABHAI CHANABHAI @ NAJABHAI KUCHHADIYA Advocate - S.D.PARMAR — 71/2021
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,65E,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB040001102021
Filing Number
71/2021
Filing Date
20-02-2021
Registration No
71/2021
Registration Date
20-02-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
306
Police Station
KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHIKHABHAI CHANABHAI @ NAJABHAI KUCHHADIYA Advocate - S.D.PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 09-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 08-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 11-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Bhikhabhai Chanabhai (Najabhai Kuchhadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 54(I), 65(E), and 81, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to weak and contradictory witness evidence. The court held that the prosecution's witnesses were not credible and their testimonies were inconsistent, while the independent witnesses and investigating officer's evidence did not adequately support the charges of illegal possession and sale of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Bhikhabhai Chanabhai (Najabhai Kuchhadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 54(I), 65(E), and 81, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to weak and contradictory witness evidence. The court held that the prosecution's witnesses were not credible and their testimonies were inconsistent, while the independent witnesses and investigating officer's evidence did not adequately support the charges of illegal possession and sale of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts