Government of Gujarat vs Saraman Rana Makavana Advocate - M A MANGHERA — 911/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB030012792023
Filing Number
911/2023
Filing Date
02-11-2023
Registration No
911/2023
Registration Date
02-11-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
574
Police Station
RANAVAV POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Saraman Rana Makavana Advocate - M A MANGHERA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506(2) for allegedly beating a victim with a stick causing injuries and threatening language on September 17, 2023. The court found that while the FIR was lodged on September 22, 2023 (five days later), critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—including contradictions between the FIR date, police report, medical certificate, and witness statements regarding when the alleged assault occurred—created reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond suspicion, relying on contradictory testimonies and delayed FIR registration without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506(2) for allegedly beating a victim with a stick causing injuries and threatening language on September 17, 2023. The court found that while the FIR was lodged on September 22, 2023 (five days later), critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—including contradictions between the FIR date, police report, medical certificate, and witness statements regarding when the alleged assault occurred—created reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond suspicion, relying on contradictory testimonies and delayed FIR registration without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts