Government of Gujarat vs Saraman Rana Makavana Advocate - M A MANGHERA — 911/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB030012792023

Case disposed

Filing Number

911/2023

Filing Date

02-11-2023

Registration No

911/2023

Registration Date

02-11-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

574

Police Station

RANAVAV POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 325,323,504,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Saraman Rana Makavana Advocate - M A MANGHERA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

26-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506(2) for allegedly beating a victim with a stick causing injuries and threatening language on September 17, 2023. The court found that while the FIR was lodged on September 22, 2023 (five days later), critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—including contradictions between the FIR date, police report, medical certificate, and witness statements regarding when the alleged assault occurred—created reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond suspicion, relying on contradictory testimonies and delayed FIR registration without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506(2) for allegedly beating a victim with a stick causing injuries and threatening language on September 17, 2023. The court found that while the FIR was lodged on September 22, 2023 (five days later), critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—including contradictions between the FIR date, police report, medical certificate, and witness statements regarding when the alleged assault occurred—created reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond suspicion, relying on contradictory testimonies and delayed FIR registration without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case