HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI vs RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA — 158/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB030002052025

Case disposed

Filing Number

158/2025

Filing Date

12-02-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

12-02-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI

Adv. M A MANGHERA

Respondent(s)

RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

04-05-2026

Disposed

30-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

17-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT
04-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case