HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI vs RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA — 158/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB030002052025

Filing Number

158/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI

    Adv. M A MANGHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 18-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 17-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 12-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 15-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 29-Mar-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 13-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case