HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI vs RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA — 158/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB030002052025
Filing Number
158/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
158/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAMIR DEVABHAI KHUNTI
Adv. M A MANGHERA
Respondent(s)
RAJESHBHAI NARANBHAI KOTIYA Advocate - D V SONIGRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque of ₹4,00,000. The accused had issued the cheque to the complainant as security for a legally enforceable debt, but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a demand notice, the accused failed to pay within fifteen days, constituting a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000, with additional compensation of ₹2,00,000 payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts