Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA — 109/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJPB010003522026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11218017250323
Police Station
MADHAVPUR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya
Adv. V G PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA
-
2.Devrajbhai Hirabhai Vaja
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court granted regular bail to petitioner Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya in a case involving sexual allegations with a minor girl. The court found the relationship was consensual and based on mutual love rather than force, noting contradictions between the victim's FIR statement and her medical examination report, and considered that both parties were young with minimal age difference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Reply Of Respondents
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
The court granted regular bail to petitioner Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya in a case involving sexual allegations with a minor girl. The court found the relationship was consensual and based on mutual love rather than force, noting contradictions between the victim's FIR statement and her medical examination report, and considered that both parties were young with minimal age difference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts