Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA — 109/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJPB010003522026

Case disposed

Filing Number

109/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11218017250323

Police Station

MADHAVPUR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64,(2)(I)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,6,8,17

Petitioner(s)

Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya

Adv. V G PARMAR

Respondent(s)

The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA

Devrajbhai Hirabhai Vaja

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

REPLY OF RESPONDENTS

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted regular bail to petitioner Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya in a case involving sexual allegations with a minor girl. The court found the relationship was consensual and based on mutual love rather than force, noting contradictions between the victim's FIR statement and her medical examination report, and considered that both parties were young with minimal age difference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to petitioner Karshanbhai Naranbhai Mavadiya in a case involving sexual allegations with a minor girl. The court found the relationship was consensual and based on mutual love rather than force, noting contradictions between the victim's FIR statement and her medical examination report, and considered that both parties were young with minimal age difference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case