KRISHNABHAI SHUKDEVBHAI SOLANKI vs MANGILAL DEVRAM CHOUDHARI Advocate - I U JADAV — 1639/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV070018322024

Filing Number

1639/2024

Filing Date

11-Nov-2024

Registration No

1639/2024

Registration Date

11-Nov-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, AHWA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNABHAI SHUKDEVBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. R P LAKHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGILAL DEVRAM CHOUDHARI Advocate - I U JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹3,00,000. The court sentenced the accused to two years simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹3,00,000 to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 26-Jun-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 09-Jun-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 30-May-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 28-Apr-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Feb-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 29-Jan-2025

    Reply Of I.O./Respondents

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 09-Jan-2025

    Reply Of I.O.

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 05-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 11-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 11-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1639/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹3,00,000. The court sentenced the accused to two years simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹3,00,000 to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case