Government of Gujarat vs ABUBEN SUKIRAVBHAI BARDE Advocate - H R GANGODA — 942/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV070009882024
Filing Number
942/2024
Filing Date
04-Jun-2024
Registration No
942/2024
Registration Date
04-Jun-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, AHWA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219002240049
Police Station
AHWA POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABUBEN SUKIRAVBHAI BARDE Advocate - H R GANGODA
-
2.DILIPBHAI SUKIRAVBHAI BARDE
-
3.DIPAKBHAI SUKIRAVBHAI BARDE
-
4.HANIFBHAI SUKIRAVBHAI BARDE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence of joint criminal responsibility in a land dispute case. The court ruled that while the complainant testified about assault and threats, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding intentional insult and provocation needed for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 942/2024
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence of joint criminal responsibility in a land dispute case. The court ruled that while the complainant testified about assault and threats, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding intentional insult and provocation needed for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts