THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAHIDBHAI ALLUBHAI NARELI Advocate - A.H.BAGVAN — 158/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV070001622019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
158/2019
Filing Date
09-01-2019
Registration No
158/2019
Registration Date
09-01-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, AHWA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
SAPUTARA POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAHIDBHAI ALLUBHAI NARELI Advocate - A.H.BAGVAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 08-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused (Jahida Bhai Allubbhai Naresha) of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177 and 184 for a rash and negligent driving incident. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that the accused drove the vehicle in a rash or negligent manner endangering human life; mere high-speed driving alone does not constitute rash/negligent driving without corroborating evidence of the manner of driving, road conditions, and traffic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused (Jahida Bhai Allubbhai Naresha) of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177 and 184 for a rash and negligent driving incident. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that the accused drove the vehicle in a rash or negligent manner endangering human life; mere high-speed driving alone does not constitute rash/negligent driving without corroborating evidence of the manner of driving, road conditions, and traffic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts