SARFRAJ SATTARBHAI BELIM vs JINATBANU IKBAL BELIM Advocate - N.B.NAIK — 93/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV030064782021
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
93/2021
Filing Date
12-10-2021
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
12-10-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDEVI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SARFRAJ SATTARBHAI BELIM
Adv. A.P.MAHETA
Respondent(s)
JINATBANU IKBAL BELIM Advocate - N.B.NAIK
JAFARBHAI IKBAL BELIM
AFZALBHAI IKBAL BELIM
SHABBIRBHAI IKBAL BELIM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court Order: R.C.S. No. 93/2021 - Gujarati Civil Court The court partially granted the plaintiff's interim relief petition in this specific performance suit concerning immovable property. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on a notarized agreement to sell and part performance (payment of Rs. 19,00,000 and possession of property). Accordingly, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained regarding the disputed property until final judgment, and granted partial interim relief restraining the defendants from transferring or encumbering the property while preserving the plaintiff's legal rights. Costs to follow the final outcome of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Order: R.C.S. No. 93/2021 - Gujarati Civil Court The court partially granted the plaintiff's interim relief petition in this specific performance suit concerning immovable property. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on a notarized agreement to sell and part performance (payment of Rs. 19,00,000 and possession of property). Accordingly, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained regarding the disputed property until final judgment, and granted partial interim relief restraining the defendants from transferring or encumbering the property while preserving the plaintiff's legal rights. Costs to follow the final outcome of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts