DIPTIBEN MANISHKUMAR LATHIGRA vs MANAGER OF BANK OF BARODA — 17/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 10,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJNV020096622020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17/2020
Filing Date
29-10-2020
Registration No
17/2020
Registration Date
29-10-2020
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPTIBEN MANISHKUMAR LATHIGRA
Adv. V.A.NAIK
Respondent(s)
MANAGER OF BANK OF BARODA
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOM TAX
KHURDINO SUGANDI
HARESH G. SUGANDHI
KAMLABEN G. SUGANDHI
SAPNA S. SUGANDHI
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
DHAVAL MANISHKUMAR LATHIGARA
KRINA MANISHKUMAR LATHIGRA
SUNILBHAI VRAJLAL LATHIGRA
SONALBEN VRAJLAL LATHIGRA
JITENDRA VRAJLAL LATHIGRA
PARUL VRAJLAL LATHIGRA W/O BHAVESH CHOKSI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC, finding that the case was barred under Section 243 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which provides that proceedings under the repealed Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 should continue under those old Acts and cannot be transferred to new proceedings. The court held that the plaintiff's suit disclosed no cause of action and was manifestly vexatious, as it attempted to circumvent the statutory bar through clever drafting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC, finding that the case was barred under Section 243 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which provides that proceedings under the repealed Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 should continue under those old Acts and cannot be transferred to new proceedings. The court held that the plaintiff's suit disclosed no cause of action and was manifestly vexatious, as it attempted to circumvent the statutory bar through clever drafting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts