PANKAJSINGH OMPRAKASH RAJPUT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 252/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION

CNR: GJNV010003832026

Filing Number

252/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

4-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822024260004

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJSINGH OMPRAKASH RAJPUT

    Adv. A U SOLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court granted bail to the accused, Pankajsinh Omprakash Rajput, in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), 3(5), and ITA-2000 sections 66(c) and 66(d). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused had cooperated with authorities, and there was no evidence of tampering with witnesses or obstructing justice. The court imposed strict conditions including a bail bond of ₹50,000, regular court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to the accused, Pankajsinh Omprakash Rajput, in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), 3(5), and ITA-2000 sections 66(c) and 66(d). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused had cooperated with authorities, and there was no evidence of tampering with witnesses or obstructing justice. The court imposed strict conditions including a bail bond of ₹50,000, regular court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case