PANKAJSINGH OMPRAKASH RAJPUT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 252/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION
CNR: GJNV010003832026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
252/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
252/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
4-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822024260004
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANKAJSINGH OMPRAKASH RAJPUT
Adv. A U SOLA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to the accused, Pankajsinh Omprakash Rajput, in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), 3(5), and ITA-2000 sections 66(c) and 66(d). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused had cooperated with authorities, and there was no evidence of tampering with witnesses or obstructing justice. The court imposed strict conditions including a bail bond of ₹50,000, regular court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to the accused, Pankajsinh Omprakash Rajput, in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), 3(5), and ITA-2000 sections 66(c) and 66(d). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused had cooperated with authorities, and there was no evidence of tampering with witnesses or obstructing justice. The court imposed strict conditions including a bail bond of ₹50,000, regular court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts