THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VASANTIBEN W/O TARSINGBHAI SHANTILAL TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1730/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030019482025

Filing Number

1730/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

1730/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250962

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASANTIBEN W/O TARSINGBHAI SHANTILAL TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1730/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted Vasantiben Tarasingbhai Tadvi of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65AA, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the police produced evidence of seizure of liquor, the prosecution's witnesses provided contradictory statements and lacked corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish that the accused actually possessed the contraband. Applying the fundamental criminal law principle that the burden of proof rests solely on the prosecution and any reasonable doubt must benefit the accused, the court acquitted the accused and ordered release of seized material as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case