THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAGARBHAI BHANGABHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1678/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030018962025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1678/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
1678/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250785
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SAGARBHAI BHANGABHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted the accused Sagarblai Bhangalai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition of Intoxicating Substance Act, 1949, Section 65AA, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution failed to produce reliable, coherent evidence linking the accused to the seized contraband, and that police testimony alone without corroborating witness evidence could not sustain conviction. The accused was ordered to pay ₹5,000 bail security with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted the accused Sagarblai Bhangalai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition of Intoxicating Substance Act, 1949, Section 65AA, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution failed to produce reliable, coherent evidence linking the accused to the seized contraband, and that police testimony alone without corroborating witness evidence could not sustain conviction. The accused was ordered to pay ₹5,000 bail security with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts