HARESHBHAI HIRABHAI SANURA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 258/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJMR060017292025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

258/2025

Filing Date

05-12-2025

Registration No

258/2025

Registration Date

05-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

962

Police Station

HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

HARESHBHAI HIRABHAI SANURA

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
ORDER

The court rejected the applicant's plea to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero camper van, Reg. No. GJ06JV6548) in a liquor prohibition case, holding that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, vehicles cannot be released on bail or bond when seized liquor exceeds 20 liters (per amended Rule 9). The court relied on established precedent that courts lack jurisdiction to order interim release of such seized vehicles pending final judgment in prohibition offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the applicant's plea to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero camper van, Reg. No. GJ06JV6548) in a liquor prohibition case, holding that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, vehicles cannot be released on bail or bond when seized liquor exceeds 20 liters (per amended Rule 9). The court relied on established precedent that courts lack jurisdiction to order interim release of such seized vehicles pending final judgment in prohibition offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case