PARSOTTAMBHAI BHANJIBHAI PATEL 4,54,000 vs JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA — 168/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060011972018
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
168/2018
Filing Date
24-05-2018
Registration No
168/2018
Registration Date
24-05-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARSOTTAMBHAI BHANJIBHAI PATEL 4,54,000
Adv. M M VAGHELA
Respondent(s)
JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
For Arguement of Asscused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-04-2026 | For Arguement of Asscused |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C.NO.168-2018 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the applicant's request to stay proceedings in all related cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the interim moratorium previously granted should be lifted. The court upheld settled legal principles that criminal proceedings under Section 138 (cheque bounce cases) cannot be stayed based on individual undertakings, as these proceedings are designed to protect the integrity of banking systems. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO.168-2018 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the applicant's request to stay proceedings in all related cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the interim moratorium previously granted should be lifted. The court upheld settled legal principles that criminal proceedings under Section 138 (cheque bounce cases) cannot be stayed based on individual undertakings, as these proceedings are designed to protect the integrity of banking systems. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts