STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURPALSINH TEJUBHA PARMAR Advocate - V P ZALA — 741/2025

JudegementView PDF

Summary The court acquitted accused Surpalsinh Tejubha Parmar of charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), and 54 (related to criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation to cause injury). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt—the victim's testimony lacked credibility, contained contradictions, and was not sufficiently corroborated by physical or documentary evidence. The court concluded that the accused's account was more plausible and that the evidence did not meet the required standard to convict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

OrderView PDF

Further Statement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 741/2025