DALVADI AMBARAMBHAI MAGANBHAI vs VITTHALBHAI MAGANBHAI DALVADI Advocate - - — 11/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 031,034,038. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR060000112015
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2015
Filing Date
16-02-2015
Registration No
11/2015
Registration Date
16-02-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DALVADI AMBARAMBHAI MAGANBHAI
Adv. P D THAKAR
Respondent(s)
VITTHALBHAI MAGANBHAI DALVADI Advocate - -
LABHUBHA KALABHA GAMETI
JIVABHA KALABHA GAMETI
KUVARBEN JIVABHA GAMETI
LALUBHA JIVABHA GAMETI
VAJUBHA JIVABHA GAMETI
JORUBHA JIVABHA GAMETI
NITUBEN JIVABHA GAMETI
NIMUBEN JIVABHA GAMETI
RANABHA KALABHA GAMETI
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 26-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 12-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case Number: R.C.S.11/2015 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court held that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land through registered sale deeds from 1971 onwards. The court directed that the status quo of the land be maintained during the pendency of the main case, and the plaintiff's interim relief claim is granted. The costs of the case shall follow the final result. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case Number: R.C.S.11/2015 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court held that the plaintiff has established prima facie ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land through registered sale deeds from 1971 onwards. The court directed that the status quo of the land be maintained during the pendency of the main case, and the plaintiff's interim relief claim is granted. The costs of the case shall follow the final result. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts