LATE NAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI AMBALIYA LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir) vs ASHOKSINH POPATBHA JADEJA Advocate - R T RANA — 2/2023

Case under Contract Act, 1872 Section 170. Status: Plaintiffs Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Plaintiffs Evidence Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMR040012342023

Filing Number

2/2023

Filing Date

17-Jun-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

17-Jun-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Contract Act, 1872 Section 170

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATE NAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI AMBALIYA LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Z A KAZI1.

  2. 2.KANCHANBEN NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

    Adv. Z A KAZI1.

  3. 3.PINAL NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

    Adv. Z A KAZI1.

  4. 4.DISHABEN NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

    Adv. Z A KAZI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKSINH POPATBHA JADEJA Advocate - R T RANA

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 04-Sep-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  8. 24-Jul-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 21-Jun-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  10. 17-Apr-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  11. 13-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: S.P.C.S. NO. 02/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition and rejected the prayer for injunction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case necessary to obtain an interlocutory injunction and did not satisfy the legal criteria for such relief. The court also directed the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs as per the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 13-Mar-2025

    Plaintiffs Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  13. 20-Feb-2025

    Order On Inerim Appli.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  14. 23-Jan-2025

    Order On Inerim Appli.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  15. 30-Dec-2024

    Order On Inerim Appli.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  16. 28-Nov-2024

    Order On Inerim Appli.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  17. 14-Nov-2024

    Order On Inerim Appli.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  18. 17-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  19. 19-Sep-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  20. 25-Jul-2024

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  21. 30-May-2024

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  22. 18-Apr-2024

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  23. 28-Mar-2024

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  24. 18-Jan-2024

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  26. 02-Nov-2023

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  27. 05-Oct-2023

    Summons Of Suit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  28. 28-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 17-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: S.P.C.S. NO. 02/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition and rejected the prayer for injunction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case necessary to obtain an interlocutory injunction and did not satisfy the legal criteria for such relief. The court also directed the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs as per the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case