LATE NAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI AMBALIYA LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir) vs ASHOKSINH POPATBHA JADEJA Advocate - R T RANA — 2/2023

Case under Contract Act, 1872 Section 170,. Status: PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMR040012342023

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2/2023

Filing Date

17-06-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

17-06-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

CONTRACT ACT, 1872 Section 170,

Petitioner(s)

LATE NAVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI AMBALIYA LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir)

Adv. Z A KAZI1.

KANCHANBEN NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

Adv. Z A KAZI1.

PINAL NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

Adv. Z A KAZI1.

DISHABEN NAVINBHAI AMBALIYA

Adv. Z A KAZI

Respondent(s)

ASHOKSINH POPATBHA JADEJA Advocate - R T RANA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

05-03-2026

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

18-12-2025

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

20-11-2025

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

09-10-2025

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

13-03-2025
ORDER

Court Order Summary Case: S.P.C.S. NO. 02/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition and rejected the prayer for injunction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case necessary to obtain an interlocutory injunction and did not satisfy the legal criteria for such relief. The court also directed the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs as per the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: S.P.C.S. NO. 02/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition and rejected the prayer for injunction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case necessary to obtain an interlocutory injunction and did not satisfy the legal criteria for such relief. The court also directed the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs as per the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case