SHERASIYA AMIBHAI MAMADBHAI vs KADIWAR ABDULBHAI JALALBHAI Advocate - F S KHORAJIA — 15/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,36,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR040005942024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
16-02-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
16-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHERASIYA AMIBHAI MAMADBHAI
Adv. P S SHAH
Respondent(s)
KADIWAR ABDULBHAI JALALBHAI Advocate - F S KHORAJIA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 17-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 16-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary R.C.S. No. 15/2024 - Gujarati Court Order The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (civil revision/appeal) has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding the property dispute with the defendant over land access rights in Jetparda village. Without proving a strong case for trial, the court held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments cannot support an injunction grant, as established legal precedent requires all three conditions for injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary R.C.S. No. 15/2024 - Gujarati Court Order The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (civil revision/appeal) has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding the property dispute with the defendant over land access rights in Jetparda village. Without proving a strong case for trial, the court held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments cannot support an injunction grant, as established legal precedent requires all three conditions for injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts