SHERASIYA AMIBHAI MAMADBHAI vs KADIWAR ABDULBHAI JALALBHAI Advocate - F S KHORAJIA — 15/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,36,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMR040005942024

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

15/2024

Filing Date

16-02-2024

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

16-02-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 35,36,

Petitioner(s)

SHERASIYA AMIBHAI MAMADBHAI

Adv. P S SHAH

Respondent(s)

KADIWAR ABDULBHAI JALALBHAI Advocate - F S KHORAJIA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

05-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

17-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

16-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

14-02-2025
ORDER
14-02-2025
ORDER

Summary R.C.S. No. 15/2024 - Gujarati Court Order The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (civil revision/appeal) has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding the property dispute with the defendant over land access rights in Jetparda village. Without proving a strong case for trial, the court held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments cannot support an injunction grant, as established legal precedent requires all three conditions for injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary R.C.S. No. 15/2024 - Gujarati Court Order The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (civil revision/appeal) has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding the property dispute with the defendant over land access rights in Jetparda village. Without proving a strong case for trial, the court held that balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments cannot support an injunction grant, as established legal precedent requires all three conditions for injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case