BALDEVSINH KIRTISINH GOHIL AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FAI. CO. LTD C A 275928 vs GULAMKHA ABDULKHA KHORAM Advocate - K G PATEL — 3673/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020042052023

Filing Number

3673/2023

Filing Date

10-May-2023

Registration No

3673/2023

Registration Date

10-May-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALDEVSINH KIRTISINH GOHIL AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FAI. CO. LTD C A 275928

    Adv. V J LAKKAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULAMKHA ABDULKHA KHORAM Advocate - K G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Gulamkha Abdulkha Khoram under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,75,928 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused is sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay the cheque amount with 9% annual interest to the complainant finance company within 60 days, with additional imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  15. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  18. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  19. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  20. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  22. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  23. 13-May-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  24. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  26. 20-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  27. 11-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  28. 03-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 10-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3673/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Gulamkha Abdulkha Khoram under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,75,928 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused is sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay the cheque amount with 9% annual interest to the complainant finance company within 60 days, with additional imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case