LEGAL HEIRES OF DARBAR VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH HEMANTSINH(Legal Heir) vs LEGAL HIERES OF DARBAR VIJAYSINH BHAGVANSINH — 14/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH160007492024
Filing Number
14/2024
Filing Date
20-Nov-2020
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
20-Nov-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEGAL HEIRES OF DARBAR VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH HEMANTSINH(Legal Heir)
Adv. N R PATEL1.
-
2.ZALA KANCHANBA W/O VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH 1.
-
3.DARBAR PINTUBHA S/O VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH 1.
-
4.ZALA KUMANSANG S/O VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH DARBAR 1.
-
5.ZALA JILUBHA S/O VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH
-
6.DARBAR VINAYSINH BHAGVANSINH HEMATSINH LGALHEIRES(Legal Heir) 2.
-
7.ZALA MANBA W/O DARBAR VINAYSINH BHAGVANSINH 2.
-
8.ZALA KIRTISINH S/O VINAYSINH BHAGVANSINH 2.
-
9.ZALA KIRANSINH S/O VINAYSINH BHAGVANSINH 2.
-
10.ZALA BHAVNABA D/O VINAYSINH BHAGVANSINH W/O ZALA DASHRATHSINH
-
11.DARBAR VIJAYSINH BHAGVANSINH HEMATSINH LEGAL HIERES OF(Legal Heir) 3.
-
12.THAKOR DHARMENDRASINH S/O VIJAYSINH BHAGVANSINH
Respondent(s)
-
1.LEGAL HIERES OF DARBAR VIJAYSINH BHAGVANSINH
-
2.LEGAL HEIRES OF DARBAR JASHAVANTSINH BHAGVANSINH(Legal Heir)
-
3.LEGAL HIERES OF DARBAR DANSINH BHAGVANSINH(Legal Heir)
-
4.DARBAR VISHNUSINH BHAGVANSINH HEMATSINH
Adv. S C NAYAK
-
5.PATEL KALABHAI BABABHAI
Adv. D.R.YAGNIK-G/570/
-
6.LEGAL HIERES OF PATEL KANTIBHAI JOITABHAI(Legal Heir)
-
7.PATEL PARSOTTAMDAS AMBALAL
Adv. D.R.YAGNIK-G/570/
-
8.PATEL KAINYALAL KANTILAL
Adv. A.S.PRAJAPATI
-
9.PATEL DINESHKUMAR PRABHUDAS
-
10.PATEL PRAVINKUMAR KESHAVLAL
-
11.PATEL MAHENDRKUMAR SHANKARLAL
-
12.PATEL BHARATKUMAR GOVINDLAL
Case History
-
30-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a temporary/interim injunction (Anjack-5) under CPC Order-39, Rule 1-2, and Section 151. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable injury as required by the landmark Supreme Court judgment in Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandese case. Additionally, the court noted that the defendants appear to be bona fide purchasers with lawful possession of the disputed agricultural land, and granting the injunction would cause disproportionate harm to them. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
10-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2024
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a temporary/interim injunction (Anjack-5) under CPC Order-39, Rule 1-2, and Section 151. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable injury as required by the landmark Supreme Court judgment in Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandese case. Additionally, the court noted that the defendants appear to be bona fide purchasers with lawful possession of the disputed agricultural land, and granting the injunction would cause disproportionate harm to them. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts