GOKALBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI vs MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHAKARI DUTH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 62/2017
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJMH140003372017
Filing Number
62/2017
Filing Date
23-Nov-2017
Registration No
62/2017
Registration Date
23-Nov-2017
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOKALBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI
Adv. A R SHAHJADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHAKARI DUTH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Apr-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2025
Appellant's Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed a recovery petition filed by Chouri Goklabhai Shankarbhai under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner claimed ₹12,20,949 from the Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers' Union, alleging unpaid wages, earned leave encashment, overtime compensation, bonus differential, and interim relief. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate the claimed amount and did not establish a legal entitlement to the claimed sum, rendering the recovery petition dismissible for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2025
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Sep-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Jul-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Jun-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-May-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Feb-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Dec-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Nov-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Jul-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Jun-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Sep-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Jul-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Jun-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-May-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Apr-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Mar-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Jan-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Dec-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Oct-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Sep-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Aug-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Jun-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Mar-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Jan-2021
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Dec-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Oct-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Aug-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Jun-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jan-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Nov-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Aug-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-May-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Apr-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jan-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Dec-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Oct-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Aug-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Jun-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-May-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Mar-2018
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Dec-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2017
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed a recovery petition filed by Chouri Goklabhai Shankarbhai under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner claimed ₹12,20,949 from the Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers' Union, alleging unpaid wages, earned leave encashment, overtime compensation, bonus differential, and interim relief. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate the claimed amount and did not establish a legal entitlement to the claimed sum, rendering the recovery petition dismissible for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts