GOKALBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI vs MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHAKARI DUTH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 62/2017
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C,. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJMH140003372017
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
62/2017
Filing Date
23-11-2017
Registration No
62/2017
Registration Date
23-11-2017
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOKALBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI
Adv. A R SHAHJADA
Respondent(s)
MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHAKARI DUTH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-04-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 19-02-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 09-02-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed a recovery petition filed by Chouri Goklabhai Shankarbhai under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner claimed ₹12,20,949 from the Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers' Union, alleging unpaid wages, earned leave encashment, overtime compensation, bonus differential, and interim relief. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate the claimed amount and did not establish a legal entitlement to the claimed sum, rendering the recovery petition dismissible for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed a recovery petition filed by Chouri Goklabhai Shankarbhai under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner claimed ₹12,20,949 from the Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers' Union, alleging unpaid wages, earned leave encashment, overtime compensation, bonus differential, and interim relief. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate the claimed amount and did not establish a legal entitlement to the claimed sum, rendering the recovery petition dismissible for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts