KHUSHALBHAI BHIKHABHAI PARMAR vs DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI — 14/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJMH140000352020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2020
Filing Date
17-07-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
17-07-2020
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KHUSHALBHAI BHIKHABHAI PARMAR
Adv. A R SHAHJADA
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI
KARYAPALAK IJNERSHRI
Adv. P A GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | For award | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party | |
| 10-02-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 06-01-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Mehsana Labour Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated a daily-wage worker (Khushalbhai Parmar) on 31/05/1999 without proper notice or compensation, violating the Industrial Disputes Act. Instead of reinstatement (given 20+ years delay in filing the complaint), the court awarded ₹50,000 compensation plus 6% interest, ₹5,000 case cost, and directed payment within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Mehsana Labour Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated a daily-wage worker (Khushalbhai Parmar) on 31/05/1999 without proper notice or compensation, violating the Industrial Disputes Act. Instead of reinstatement (given 20+ years delay in filing the complaint), the court awarded ₹50,000 compensation plus 6% interest, ₹5,000 case cost, and directed payment within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts