GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ROHITJI VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - S D ZALA — 1525/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 331(4),305(7),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH120019882025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1525/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Registration No
1525/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNJHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206033250598
Police Station
UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ROHITJI VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - S D ZALA
MUKESHJI VINUJI THAKOR
Adv. S D ZALA
RONAKKUMAR PANKAJBHAI PARMAR
Adv. A K BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-02-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Unjha acquitted all three accused in this theft case due to insufficient evidence. Although the complainant testified that silver items worth approximately ₹1,20,000 were stolen from a temple between August 31 and September 2, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the identity of the perpetrators or prove the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Unjha acquitted all three accused in this theft case due to insufficient evidence. Although the complainant testified that silver items worth approximately ₹1,20,000 were stolen from a temple between August 31 and September 2, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the identity of the perpetrators or prove the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts