GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ROHITJI VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - S D ZALA — 1525/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 331(4),305(7),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120019882025

Filing Number

1525/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

1525/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033250598

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 331(4),305(7),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHITJI VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - S D ZALA

  2. 2.MUKESHJI VINUJI THAKOR

    Adv. S D ZALA

  3. 3.RONAKKUMAR PANKAJBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. A K BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Unjha acquitted all three accused in this theft case due to insufficient evidence. Although the complainant testified that silver items worth approximately ₹1,20,000 were stolen from a temple between August 31 and September 2, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the identity of the perpetrators or prove the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1525/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Unjha acquitted all three accused in this theft case due to insufficient evidence. Although the complainant testified that silver items worth approximately ₹1,20,000 were stolen from a temple between August 31 and September 2, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the identity of the perpetrators or prove the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case