THAKOR KAILASHBEN PARABATJI vs SATHAWARA MAYURKUMAR KANUBHAI Advocate - R S DARJI — 657/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH110008742024

Filing Number

657/2024

Filing Date

16-Dec-2024

Registration No

657/2024

Registration Date

16-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR KAILASHBEN PARABATJI

    Adv. L A MEVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATHAWARA MAYURKUMAR KANUBHAI Advocate - R S DARJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 75,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant sufficiently proved the cheque was issued for discharging a lawful debt, establishing the mandatory statutory presumption in favor of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence despite claiming settlement, as his own admissions and the documentary evidence established his liability. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 75,000 compensation to the complainant plus interest under CrPC Section 357(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 14-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 20-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 28-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 31-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 13-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 16-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 657/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 75,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant sufficiently proved the cheque was issued for discharging a lawful debt, establishing the mandatory statutory presumption in favor of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence despite claiming settlement, as his own admissions and the documentary evidence established his liability. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 75,000 compensation to the complainant plus interest under CrPC Section 357(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case