THAKOR KAILASHBEN PARABATJI vs SATHAWARA MAYURKUMAR KANUBHAI Advocate - R S DARJI — 657/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH110008742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
657/2024
Filing Date
16-12-2024
Registration No
657/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR KAILASHBEN PARABATJI
Adv. L A MEVA
Respondent(s)
SATHAWARA MAYURKUMAR KANUBHAI Advocate - R S DARJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 75,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant sufficiently proved the cheque was issued for discharging a lawful debt, establishing the mandatory statutory presumption in favor of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence despite claiming settlement, as his own admissions and the documentary evidence established his liability. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 75,000 compensation to the complainant plus interest under CrPC Section 357(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 75,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant sufficiently proved the cheque was issued for discharging a lawful debt, establishing the mandatory statutory presumption in favor of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence despite claiming settlement, as his own admissions and the documentary evidence established his liability. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 75,000 compensation to the complainant plus interest under CrPC Section 357(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts