PATEL DIPAKBHAI KEVALDAS vs TALATI CUM MANTRI, SATLASANA GRAM PANCHAYAT Advocate - P J THAKOR — 28/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH110007752023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2023
Filing Date
24-11-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
24-11-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL DIPAKBHAI KEVALDAS
Adv. R B DARJI
Respondent(s)
TALATI CUM MANTRI, SATLASANA GRAM PANCHAYAT Advocate - P J THAKOR
PRAJAPAT BRAHMAKUMARI ISHAWARIY KANYA VIDHYALAYA I/c. SHILPABEN AND SAKUBEN
Adv. A S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking declaration of ownership rights and permanent injunction over agricultural property in Satlasana. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Plot 5/148/6) and that the temporary permit granted by the gram panchayat for cattle shed construction did not authorize permanent structures. Additionally, the plaintiff violated procedural requirements under the Gujarat Panchayat Act by not providing proper notice to the panchayat before filing the case, rendering the suit inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking declaration of ownership rights and permanent injunction over agricultural property in Satlasana. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Plot 5/148/6) and that the temporary permit granted by the gram panchayat for cattle shed construction did not authorize permanent structures. Additionally, the plaintiff violated procedural requirements under the Gujarat Panchayat Act by not providing proper notice to the panchayat before filing the case, rendering the suit inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts