PATEL DIPAKBHAI KEVALDAS vs TALATI CUM MANTRI, SATLASANA GRAM PANCHAYAT Advocate - P J THAKOR — 28/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH110007752023
Filing Number
28/2023
Filing Date
24-Nov-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
24-Nov-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL DIPAKBHAI KEVALDAS
Adv. R B DARJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.TALATI CUM MANTRI, SATLASANA GRAM PANCHAYAT Advocate - P J THAKOR
-
2.PRAJAPAT BRAHMAKUMARI ISHAWARIY KANYA VIDHYALAYA I/c. SHILPABEN AND SAKUBEN
Adv. A S PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking declaration of ownership rights and permanent injunction over agricultural property in Satlasana. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Plot 5/148/6) and that the temporary permit granted by the gram panchayat for cattle shed construction did not authorize permanent structures. Additionally, the plaintiff violated procedural requirements under the Gujarat Panchayat Act by not providing proper notice to the panchayat before filing the case, rendering the suit inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
For Counter Affidavit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-May-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2023
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking declaration of ownership rights and permanent injunction over agricultural property in Satlasana. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Plot 5/148/6) and that the temporary permit granted by the gram panchayat for cattle shed construction did not authorize permanent structures. Additionally, the plaintiff violated procedural requirements under the Gujarat Panchayat Act by not providing proper notice to the panchayat before filing the case, rendering the suit inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts