BHORNIYA ABDULBHAI SULEMANBHAI vs KHATAKI SATARBHAI SARFARAJBHAI Advocate - I A MANSURI — 644/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090008932024

Filing Number

644/2024

Filing Date

21-Sep-2024

Registration No

644/2024

Registration Date

21-Sep-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHORNIYA ABDULBHAI SULEMANBHAI

    Adv. M J PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHATAKI SATARBHAI SARFARAJBHAI Advocate - I A MANSURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Vadnagar Court convicted the accused Khataki Satarbhai Sarfarajbhai under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹1,00,000 due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant Bhorniya Abdulbhai had established all essential elements of the offense, including presentation of the cheque within six months, proper notice to the drawer, and the drawer's failure to make payment within 15 days. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹1,00,000 compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 26-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 12-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 16-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 08-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 21-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 644/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadnagar Court convicted the accused Khataki Satarbhai Sarfarajbhai under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹1,00,000 due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant Bhorniya Abdulbhai had established all essential elements of the offense, including presentation of the cheque within six months, proper notice to the drawer, and the drawer's failure to make payment within 15 days. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹1,00,000 compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case