CHAUDHARI PRAKASHKUMAR GOVINDBHAI vs PATEL KAUSHIKKUMAR NARAYANBHAI JOITARAM Advocate - B A NAYAK — 12/2013
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 038. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060000272013
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2013
Filing Date
29-03-2013
Registration No
12/2013
Registration Date
29-03-2013
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUDHARI PRAKASHKUMAR GOVINDBHAI
Adv. J S CHAUDHARI
PATEL RAJENDRAKUMAR SHANKARLAL
Adv. J S CHAUDHARI
PATEL BHARATKUMAR KANTILAL
Adv. J S CHAUDHARI
PATEL PRAHLADBHAI KANDAS
Adv. J S CHAUDHARI
Respondent(s)
PATEL KAUSHIKKUMAR NARAYANBHAI JOITARAM Advocate - B A NAYAK
PATEL NARAYAN BHAI JOITARAM KALIDAS
PATEL GOVINDBHAI MAGANLAL SHANKARDAS
PATEL VINODBHAI PRAHLADBHAI MANILAL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 12 of 2013 | Taluka Court, Visnagar Outcome: The court partially granted the plaintiffs' relief while maintaining the status quo of the disputed property. The court ordered that defendants cannot alter, damage, or interfere with the plaintiffs' possession and use of the property until final judgment, and the boundary wall dispute between the parties (involving a 9'5" wall on the southern boundary) remains to be decided on merits, with both parties required to maintain the existing conditions of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 12 of 2013 | Taluka Court, Visnagar Outcome: The court partially granted the plaintiffs' relief while maintaining the status quo of the disputed property. The court ordered that defendants cannot alter, damage, or interfere with the plaintiffs' possession and use of the property until final judgment, and the boundary wall dispute between the parties (involving a 9'5" wall on the southern boundary) remains to be decided on merits, with both parties required to maintain the existing conditions of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts