Government of Gujarat vs PRAJAPATI ASHOKKUMAR AMRUTLAL KARSHANBHAI Advocate - S G MEMON — 443/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125,(A)(B),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH050006522025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

443/2025

Filing Date

24-07-2025

Registration No

443/2025

Registration Date

24-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206023250075

Police Station

KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,125,(A)(B),
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAJAPATI ASHOKKUMAR AMRUTLAL KARSHANBHAI Advocate - S G MEMON

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

05-05-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

03-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: C.C.No. 443 of 2025 The court acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281, 125(a)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 177, 184 for a vehicle collision causing injury. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused negligently or recklessly drove the vehicle, as the prosecution failed to establish specific facts about vehicle speed, mechanical condition, or driver identity beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No. 443 of 2025 The court acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281, 125(a)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 177, 184 for a vehicle collision causing injury. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused negligently or recklessly drove the vehicle, as the prosecution failed to establish specific facts about vehicle speed, mechanical condition, or driver identity beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case