RAGUVIR GODADBHAI CHAUDHRY vs Government of India — 20/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH050005642016
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2016
Filing Date
03-09-2016
Registration No
20/2016
Registration Date
03-09-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHERALU
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAGUVIR GODADBHAI CHAUDHRY
Adv. M.D.DESAI
Respondent(s)
Government of India
rajiben babubhai
kanjibhai lavjibhai chaudhary
Adv. B.K.THAKOR
bhagavanbhai bhikhabhai chaudhary
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 02-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 27-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 20/2016 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking a mandatory injunction order. The court held that while mandatory injunctions can be granted in exceptional cases, the plaintiff failed to establish a sufficiently strong prima facie case and did not demonstrate that withholding relief would cause irreparable harm meeting the high threshold required. The court found that the defendant's construction work (barrier) was undertaken before the suit filing, and the plaintiff's delay in challenging it weakened their claim for mandatory relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 20/2016 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking a mandatory injunction order. The court held that while mandatory injunctions can be granted in exceptional cases, the plaintiff failed to establish a sufficiently strong prima facie case and did not demonstrate that withholding relief would cause irreparable harm meeting the high threshold required. The court found that the defendant's construction work (barrier) was undertaken before the suit filing, and the plaintiff's delay in challenging it weakened their claim for mandatory relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts