PATEL SEJALBEN ASHVINKUMAR vs THAKOR KANTABEN AMBARAM Advocate - V J THAKOR — 15/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 133,C80,0380. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH030011892023
Filing Number
15/2023
Filing Date
14-Feb-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
14-Feb-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADI
Judge
2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL SEJALBEN ASHVINKUMAR
Adv. H J PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR KANTABEN AMBARAM Advocate - V J THAKOR
-
2.RAMTUJI AMBARAMJI
-
3.MANAJI AMBARAMJI
Adv. V J THAKOR
-
4.RANJANBEN PRATAPJI
Adv. V J THAKOR
-
5.THAKOR RAMAJI PRATAPJI
Adv. V J THAKOR
-
6.THAKOR ROHITJI PRATAPJI
Adv. V J THAKOR
-
7.DINESHJI SHAKRAJI
-
8.VASUJI RAMTUJI
-
9.MAKIBEN RAMTUJI
-
10.THAKOR ASHABEN RAMTUJI
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Apr-2025
Witness List
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The court granted the plaintiff's application for a mandatory injunction to restrain the defendants from selling or transferring the disputed agricultural property and ordered them to maintain the status quo. The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case for relief based on documentary evidence showing a valid purchase agreement, and there was irreparable harm if the property were alienated before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2025
Issues
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Feb-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Sep-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Feb-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2023
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The court granted the plaintiff's application for a mandatory injunction to restrain the defendants from selling or transferring the disputed agricultural property and ordered them to maintain the status quo. The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case for relief based on documentary evidence showing a valid purchase agreement, and there was irreparable harm if the property were alienated before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts