RAJENDRASINH PRAVINSINH RAOL vs MITESH BALDEVBHAI ADHIYOL OWNER OF OMSAI MOBILE Advocate - A A SAIYAD — 387/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH030006382024
Filing Number
387/2024
Filing Date
15-02-2024
Registration No
387/2024
Registration Date
15-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADI
Judge
9-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH PRAVINSINH RAOL
Adv. K K DAVE
Respondent(s)
MITESH BALDEVBHAI ADHIYOL OWNER OF OMSAI MOBILE Advocate - A A SAIYAD
Hearing History
Judge: 9-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 31-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused, Mitesh Baldevbhai Adhiyol (Om Sai Mobile owner), guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹4,90,000 to the complainant Rajendra Singh Pravinsigh Raol in December 2023 for discharge of a legitimate debt. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹4,90,000 as compensation to the complainant within one month, with an additional six months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused, Mitesh Baldevbhai Adhiyol (Om Sai Mobile owner), guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹4,90,000 to the complainant Rajendra Singh Pravinsigh Raol in December 2023 for discharge of a legitimate debt. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹4,90,000 as compensation to the complainant within one month, with an additional six months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts