MITESHKUMAR HARIRAMDAS SADHU vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A S MAKWANA — 252/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007412026

Filing Number

252/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

3-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206020260116

Police Station

KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(2),318(2),318(4),319,336(2),340,351(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITESHKUMAR HARIRAMDAS SADHU

    Adv. B S PANCHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A S MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The Additional Sessions Judge, Mahesana rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Miteshkumar Hariramdas Sadhu (CRMA(S) No. 252/2026). The court found that the accused, posing as a fake lawyer named "Avinash Rawal," engaged in an elaborate fraud scheme involving forged legal documents and impersonation, defrauding multiple victims of approximately ₹3.27 lakhs through intimidation and false promises. The court determined this was a serious socio-economic crime requiring custodial investigation and applied established legal principles that anticipatory bail should only be granted in exceptional circumstances, finding no such circumstances present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The Additional Sessions Judge, Mahesana rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Miteshkumar Hariramdas Sadhu (CRMA(S) No. 252/2026). The court found that the accused, posing as a fake lawyer named "Avinash Rawal," engaged in an elaborate fraud scheme involving forged legal documents and impersonation, defrauding multiple victims of approximately ₹3.27 lakhs through intimidation and false promises. The court determined this was a serious socio-economic crime requiring custodial investigation and applied established legal principles that anticipatory bail should only be granted in exceptional circumstances, finding no such circumstances present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case