MUKESHBHAI NANABHAI VALAND vs KASHIBEN WD/O DHULABHAI Advocate - V R PATEL — 46/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJLV070006842025
Filing Number
46/2025
Filing Date
26-Aug-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
26-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIRPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESHBHAI NANABHAI VALAND
Adv. J D PATEL
-
2.BHUPENDRABHAI NANABHAI VALAND
Adv. J D PATEL
-
3.RUKHIBEN WD/O NANABHAI VALAND
Adv. J D PATEL
-
4.SUDHABEN D/O NANABHAI AND W/O BHAILALBHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KASHIBEN WD/O DHULABHAI Advocate - V R PATEL
-
2.VALAND AMBALAL DHULABHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
3.VALAND SHARDABEN D/O DHULABHAI AND W/O CHIMANBHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
4.VALAND KANUBHAI DHULABHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
5.VALAND KANTIBHAI DHULABHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
6.MANJULABEN WD/O RAYJIBHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
7.VALAND MAHESHBHAI RAYJIBHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
8.VALAND JAYESHKUMAR RAYJIBHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
9.BHIKHIBEN KANUBHAI VALAND
Adv. V R PATEL
-
10.RAHULKUMAR KANUBHAI VALAND
Adv. V R PATEL
-
11.MANISHABEN KANUBHAI VALAND W/O KALPESHBHAI
Adv. V R PATEL
-
12.SAROJBEN KANUBHAI VALAND W/O VIPULKUMAR
-
13.RASHMIBEN KANUBHAI VALAND W/O DIPAKKUMAR
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2026
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 46/2025 Petitioners: Mukeshbhai Nanabhai Valand, Bhupendrabhai Nanabhai Valand, and Rukhiben (widow of Nanabhai) Respondents: Kashiben and others Order: Both interim relief applications (Article 5 and Article 39) filed by the petitioners were DISMISSED. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought. The respondents' right to reply was barred as they did not appear despite proper service. Costs reserved for final judgment. Case adjourned to 08/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Dec-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2025
Case Summary: 46/2025 Petitioners: Mukeshbhai Nanabhai Valand, Bhupendrabhai Nanabhai Valand, and Rukhiben (widow of Nanabhai) Respondents: Kashiben and others Order: Both interim relief applications (Article 5 and Article 39) filed by the petitioners were DISMISSED. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought. The respondents' right to reply was barred as they did not appear despite proper service. Costs reserved for final judgment. Case adjourned to 08/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts