RAMESH KUMAR GAMNARAM MESHAN vs MS. BAKAROS PERFUME AND BEAUTY PRODUCTION PVT. LTD. Advocate - M R SHARMA — 44/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJKT140003202021
Filing Number
44/2021
Filing Date
16-04-2021
Registration No
44/2021
Registration Date
16-04-2021
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHUJ
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH KUMAR GAMNARAM MESHAN
Adv. PREMKUMAR
Respondent(s)
MS. BAKAROS PERFUME AND BEAUTY PRODUCTION PVT. LTD. Advocate - M R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
For Order
For Order
For Order
For Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | For Order |
| 11-03-2026 | For Order |
| 10-02-2026 | For Order |
| 27-01-2026 | For Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Labour Court, Gandhidham dismissed an industrial dispute (Reference T No. 44 of 2021) filed by worker Rameshkumar Gamnaraem Mension against Bakkaroz Perfume & Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. The court found that the company's termination of the worker on 25/02/2021 was justified, as the domestic inquiry was properly conducted following due process, the charges against the worker were substantiated, and the punishment was proportionate to the misconduct. The worker's claims for reinstatement with back wages and benefits were therefore rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court, Gandhidham dismissed an industrial dispute (Reference T No. 44 of 2021) filed by worker Rameshkumar Gamnaraem Mension against Bakkaroz Perfume & Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. The court found that the company's termination of the worker on 25/02/2021 was justified, as the domestic inquiry was properly conducted following due process, the charges against the worker were substantiated, and the punishment was proportionate to the misconduct. The worker's claims for reinstatement with back wages and benefits were therefore rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts