HIRODEVI TAJARAM JAAT vs MOMAI TRANSPORT — 9/2017

Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 010. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal

CNR: GJKT140001772017

Filing Number

9/2017

Filing Date

12-Apr-2017

Registration No

9/2017

Registration Date

12-Apr-2017

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 010

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRODEVI TAJARAM JAAT

    Adv. A.P.LEUVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOMAI TRANSPORT

  2. 2.SBI GENETAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. S.H.SACHDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court (Gandhidham) partially allowed a workmen's compensation claim filed by the heirs of Tajaaram Rupaaram Chaudhary, a truck driver who died of a heart attack on October 27, 2015, while working for the employer. The court held that the death resulted from employment-related stress and strain, finding a causal connection between the work and the fatal heart attack. Accordingly, the court ordered Employer No. 2 (insurance company) to pay compensation of ₹7,74,600 with 12% interest from the accident date, and Employer No. 1 (vehicle owner) to pay 50% penalty on the compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  15. 25-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 10-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 27-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 13-Feb-2025

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 09-Jan-2025

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 12-Dec-2024

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 07-Nov-2024

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 12-Sep-2024

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 08-Aug-2024

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 13-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 02-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 04-Apr-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 07-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 01-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 04-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 07-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 12-Oct-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 03-Aug-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 06-Jul-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 08-May-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 13-Mar-2023

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 10-Feb-2023

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 09-Dec-2022

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 04-Nov-2022

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 02-Sep-2022

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 01-Jul-2022

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 03-Jun-2022

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 07-Apr-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 10-Feb-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 09-Dec-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 08-Sep-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 07-Jul-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 05-May-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 11-Feb-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 10-Dec-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 15-Oct-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 10-Sep-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 06-Aug-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  55. 02-Jul-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  56. 07-May-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  57. 13-Feb-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  58. 02-Jan-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 07-Nov-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 05-Sep-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 05-Jul-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 03-May-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 15-Mar-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 04-Jan-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  65. 02-Nov-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  66. 07-Sep-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  67. 13-Jul-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  68. 11-May-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  69. 09-Mar-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  70. 12-Jan-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  71. 10-Nov-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  72. 08-Sep-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  73. 14-Jul-2017

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  74. 05-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 12-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court (Gandhidham) partially allowed a workmen's compensation claim filed by the heirs of Tajaaram Rupaaram Chaudhary, a truck driver who died of a heart attack on October 27, 2015, while working for the employer. The court held that the death resulted from employment-related stress and strain, finding a causal connection between the work and the fatal heart attack. Accordingly, the court ordered Employer No. 2 (insurance company) to pay compensation of ₹7,74,600 with 12% interest from the accident date, and Employer No. 1 (vehicle owner) to pay 50% penalty on the compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case