MONGHIBEN PREMJIBHAI PATEL AND OTHERS vs JAYRAM GANESHA PATEL Advocate - G P KHATRI — 22/2010

Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 010. Status: For Arguement of opponent. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

For Arguement of opponent Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal

CNR: GJKT140000852010

Filing Number

22/2010

Filing Date

09-Sep-2010

Registration No

22/2010

Registration Date

09-Sep-2010

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 010

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONGHIBEN PREMJIBHAI PATEL AND OTHERS

    Adv. V K MADHVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYRAM GANESHA PATEL Advocate - G P KHATRI

  2. 2.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  3. 13-May-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  17. 18-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  19. 09-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 16-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 17-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 17-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 27-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 09-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 23-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 12-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 26-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 12-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 22-Oct-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 15-Oct-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 08-Oct-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 01-Oct-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 10-Sep-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 02-Sep-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 05-Aug-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 08-Jul-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 10-Jun-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 06-May-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 08-Apr-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 05-Mar-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 01-Mar-2024

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 03-Jun-2016

    JudegementView PDF

    This is a Gujarati language court order from the Labour Court, Ahmedabad (dated 22/2010). The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent company to pay the applicant Rs. 3,58,340 as back wages along with 12% interest, finding that the applicant was wrongfully terminated without proper notice or compensation as required under labor law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  43. 03-Jun-2016

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 06-May-2016

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  45. 11-Apr-2016

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  46. 10-Mar-2016

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  47. 04-Mar-2016

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  48. 05-Feb-2016

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  49. 08-Dec-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  50. 06-Oct-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  51. 12-Aug-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  52. 01-Jul-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  53. 10-Apr-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  54. 10-Feb-2015

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  55. 09-Dec-2014

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  56. 07-Oct-2014

    For Notice Serve to opponent

  57. 05-Aug-2014

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 03-Jun-2014

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 02-Apr-2014

    For Reply of opponent

  60. 03-Feb-2014

    For Reply of opponent

  61. 09-Dec-2013

    For Reply of opponent

  62. 12-Sep-2013

    For Reply of opponent

  63. 04-Jul-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 09-Sep-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2010

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Gujarati language court order from the Labour Court, Ahmedabad (dated 22/2010). The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent company to pay the applicant Rs. 3,58,340 as back wages along with 12% interest, finding that the applicant was wrongfully terminated without proper notice or compensation as required under labor law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case