GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs VINOD DASHRATHBHAI SADHU — 797/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B),98(2),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT110013262025
Filing Number
797/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
797/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
32-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993007231086
Police Station
GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VINOD DASHRATHBHAI SADHU
SANJAY MANOHARBHAI PAMWANI
GANESH MANSUKHBHAI PRAJAPATI
Hearing History
Judge: 32-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhinagar (Gujarat) Case No.: Criminal Case No. 2790/2025 Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016 and related provisions for alleged smuggling and possession of foreign liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five panchas (witnesses) who testified did not provide corroborating evidence supporting the seizure allegations, and independent witnesses were not examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhinagar (Gujarat) Case No.: Criminal Case No. 2790/2025 Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016 and related provisions for alleged smuggling and possession of foreign liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five panchas (witnesses) who testified did not provide corroborating evidence supporting the seizure allegations, and independent witnesses were not examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts