LALJI KHIMJI SORAHIYA vs COLLACTOR SHRO Advocate - AGP — 267/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT100029392024
Filing Number
267/2024
Filing Date
14-Oct-2024
Registration No
267/2024
Registration Date
14-Oct-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
14-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALJI KHIMJI SORAHIYA
Adv. S H PALAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.COLLACTOR SHRO Advocate - AGP
-
2.MAMLTADAR SHRI
Adv. AGP
-
3.D I L R SHRI
Adv. AGP
-
4.TALARI SHIR
Adv. AGP
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
20-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 for a temporary injunction (mandatory order) regarding disputed agricultural land is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three conditions necessary for granting an interim order: (1) a prima facie case, (2) irreparable injury, and (3) balance of convenience in the plaintiff's favor. The court held that the defendant's earlier order regarding the land was legally sound and that the plaintiff's allegations lacked sufficient evidentiary support to warrant judicial intervention pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
01-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
31-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
23-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
18-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
19-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
07-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 267/2024
Summary The petition filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 for a temporary injunction (mandatory order) regarding disputed agricultural land is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three conditions necessary for granting an interim order: (1) a prima facie case, (2) irreparable injury, and (3) balance of convenience in the plaintiff's favor. The court held that the defendant's earlier order regarding the land was legally sound and that the plaintiff's allegations lacked sufficient evidentiary support to warrant judicial intervention pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts