JAYANTILAL HARILAL MISTRI vs ANIL SHAMJI SORATHIYA Advocate - J H VYAS — 131/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT100014212022
Filing Number
131/2022
Filing Date
14-04-2014
Registration No
131/2022
Registration Date
15-07-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYANTILAL HARILAL MISTRI
Adv. A J THACKER
Respondent(s)
ANIL SHAMJI SORATHIYA Advocate - J H VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging property transfers made through his elder brother. The court held that since the original property sale deed was registered in 1981 and subsequent mutations were recorded, the plaintiff's claim filed in 2013 was barred by the Limitation Act. The court found that the transfers of property by the de facto guardian (elder brother) without authority under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 were void, but the suit could not be maintained as it was filed beyond the statutory limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging property transfers made through his elder brother. The court held that since the original property sale deed was registered in 1981 and subsequent mutations were recorded, the plaintiff's claim filed in 2013 was barred by the Limitation Act. The court found that the transfers of property by the de facto guardian (elder brother) without authority under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 were void, but the suit could not be maintained as it was filed beyond the statutory limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts