VALJI SHAMJI BUCHIYA vs BHAVESH MOHANLAL SENGANI Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI — 27/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT040003912024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VALJI SHAMJI BUCHIYA
Adv. J L HALAI
Respondent(s)
BHAVESH MOHANLAL SENGANI Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI
MANILAL KANJI PATEL
Adv. V V MAHESWARI
RAMESHKUMAR MULJI PATEL
Adv. V V MAHESHWARI
MOHMADSULEMAN RAMJAN SIDI
Adv. S A RAYMA
HELIN TEKCHAND SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
SWETA HEMCHAND SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
TEKCAND JETHALAL SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of their suit seeking possession of agricultural land in Mandvi, Kutch. The court held that the plaintiff, who had occupied the property for 22 years as a caretaker, has no legal right to claim ownership or possession, as no title can be acquired through gratuitous occupation. The judgment established key legal principles that caretakers and servants cannot acquire any property rights regardless of length of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of their suit seeking possession of agricultural land in Mandvi, Kutch. The court held that the plaintiff, who had occupied the property for 22 years as a caretaker, has no legal right to claim ownership or possession, as no title can be acquired through gratuitous occupation. The judgment established key legal principles that caretakers and servants cannot acquire any property rights regardless of length of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts