VALJI SHAMJI BUCHIYA vs BHAVESH MOHANLAL SENGANI Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI — 27/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT040003912024
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
14-Mar-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
14-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VALJI SHAMJI BUCHIYA
Adv. J L HALAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAVESH MOHANLAL SENGANI Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI
-
2.MANILAL KANJI PATEL
Adv. V V MAHESWARI
-
3.RAMESHKUMAR MULJI PATEL
Adv. V V MAHESHWARI
-
4.MOHMADSULEMAN RAMJAN SIDI
Adv. S A RAYMA
-
5.HELIN TEKCHAND SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
-
6.SWETA HEMCHAND SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
-
7.TEKCAND JETHALAL SHAH (VISARIYA)
Adv. S A RAYMA
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jul-2025
Plaintiffs Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2025
OrderView PDF
-
07-May-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of their suit seeking possession of agricultural land in Mandvi, Kutch. The court held that the plaintiff, who had occupied the property for 22 years as a caretaker, has no legal right to claim ownership or possession, as no title can be acquired through gratuitous occupation. The judgment established key legal principles that caretakers and servants cannot acquire any property rights regardless of length of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2025
Issues
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2025
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2025
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2025
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2024
Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2024
Reply To Counter Claim
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2024
Reply To Counter Claim
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2024
Reply To Counter Claim
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2024
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2024
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of their suit seeking possession of agricultural land in Mandvi, Kutch. The court held that the plaintiff, who had occupied the property for 22 years as a caretaker, has no legal right to claim ownership or possession, as no title can be acquired through gratuitous occupation. The judgment established key legal principles that caretakers and servants cannot acquire any property rights regardless of length of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts