GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MOHMAD HUSEN SALIM KHOJA — 39/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030000412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

02-01-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

02-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

1497

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MOHMAD HUSEN SALIM KHOJA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 (drunk driving) because the prosecution failed to conduct a mandatory breath analyzer test to detect alcohol content in blood. The court held that detection of alcohol must be done specifically through breath analyzer as mandated by the statute, and medical/laboratory examination cannot substitute for this required procedure. The accused was acquitted without conviction as the prosecution's case lacked the essential procedural requirement for establishing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 (drunk driving) because the prosecution failed to conduct a mandatory breath analyzer test to detect alcohol content in blood. The court held that detection of alcohol must be done specifically through breath analyzer as mandated by the statute, and medical/laboratory examination cannot substitute for this required procedure. The accused was acquitted without conviction as the prosecution's case lacked the essential procedural requirement for establishing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case