GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MOHMAD HUSEN SALIM KHOJA — 39/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030000412026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1497

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHMAD HUSEN SALIM KHOJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused of charges under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 (drunk driving) because the prosecution failed to conduct a mandatory breath analyzer test to detect alcohol content in blood. The court held that detection of alcohol must be done specifically through breath analyzer as mandated by the statute, and medical/laboratory examination cannot substitute for this required procedure. The accused was acquitted without conviction as the prosecution's case lacked the essential procedural requirement for establishing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 (drunk driving) because the prosecution failed to conduct a mandatory breath analyzer test to detect alcohol content in blood. The court held that detection of alcohol must be done specifically through breath analyzer as mandated by the statute, and medical/laboratory examination cannot substitute for this required procedure. The accused was acquitted without conviction as the prosecution's case lacked the essential procedural requirement for establishing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case