SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL vs SAMA MARIYAM HUSHEN Advocate - M M SUMRA — 76/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,37. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 01st May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT020110832025
Filing Number
76/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
76/2025
Registration Date
29-12-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
45-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE and A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
BAKALI ABDUL ISMAIL TH P/W SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
BAKALI JAFAR ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
SAMA HABHIBHA MOHMADAMIN D/O BAKALI ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA(BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
BAKALI SIRIN JUNAS ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA(BAKALI)DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
SANDHISAMA MAHEZABIN IMRAN JUNAS ISMAIL TH P/W SAMA (BAKALI)DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
SAMA MOHMADMOIN JUNAS TH P/W SAMA(BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL
Adv. M L MANIYAR
Respondent(s)
SAMA MARIYAM HUSHEN Advocate - M M SUMRA
SAMA MUSA ABDULLA
Adv. M M SUMRA
SAMA IBRAHIM ABDULLA
Adv. S M GOR
SAMASANDHI MANSURALI MAMAD
Adv. K K GANATRA
GHANCHI ANIS DAUD
Adv. M A LIYA
BAFAN SIKANDAR IBRAHIM
Adv. M A LIYA
SAMA MOHMMADREHAN FIROZ
Adv. K K GANATRA
Hearing History
Judge: 45-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE and A.C.J.M.
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 17-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 01-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 11-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the plaintiff's civil suit under Order 7, Rule 11(D) of the Civil Procedure Code on the application of defendant number 3, finding the case liable for rejection at the preliminary stage. The court ordered the suit to be dismissed and directed that the costs be determined accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the plaintiff's civil suit under Order 7, Rule 11(D) of the Civil Procedure Code on the application of defendant number 3, finding the case liable for rejection at the preliminary stage. The court ordered the suit to be dismissed and directed that the costs be determined accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts