SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL vs SAMA MARIYAM HUSHEN Advocate - M M SUMRA — 76/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,37. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT020110832025

Filing Number

76/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

76/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

45-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,37
Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  2. 2.BAKALI ABDUL ISMAIL TH P/W SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  3. 3.BAKALI JAFAR ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA (BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  4. 4.SAMA HABHIBHA MOHMADAMIN D/O BAKALI ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA(BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  5. 5.BAKALI SIRIN JUNAS ISMAIL TH W/H SAMA(BAKALI)DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  6. 6.SANDHISAMA MAHEZABIN IMRAN JUNAS ISMAIL TH P/W SAMA (BAKALI)DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

  7. 7.SAMA MOHMADMOIN JUNAS TH P/W SAMA(BAKALI) DILDARHUSHEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M L MANIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAMA MARIYAM HUSHEN Advocate - M M SUMRA

  2. 2.SAMA MUSA ABDULLA

    Adv. M M SUMRA

  3. 3.SAMA IBRAHIM ABDULLA

    Adv. S M GOR

  4. 4.SAMASANDHI MANSURALI MAMAD

    Adv. K K GANATRA

  5. 5.GHANCHI ANIS DAUD

    Adv. M A LIYA

  6. 6.BAFAN SIKANDAR IBRAHIM

    Adv. M A LIYA

  7. 7.SAMA MOHMMADREHAN FIROZ

    Adv. K K GANATRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 01-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the plaintiff's civil suit under Order 7, Rule 11(D) of the Civil Procedure Code on the application of defendant number 3, finding the case liable for rejection at the preliminary stage. The court ordered the suit to be dismissed and directed that the costs be determined accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the plaintiff's civil suit under Order 7, Rule 11(D) of the Civil Procedure Code on the application of defendant number 3, finding the case liable for rejection at the preliminary stage. The court ordered the suit to be dismissed and directed that the costs be determined accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case