Government of Gujarat vs RAMESH MAMAD KOLI — 763/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020012012026

Case disposed

Filing Number

763/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

763/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

46-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205013250729

Police Station

BHUJ TALUKA MANKUVA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMESH MAMAD KOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 46-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

01-05-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-04-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

01-05-2026
ORDER

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Mamad Koli, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, Section 65(F), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the panchnama (seizure document), observing that the independent panch witness did not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband liquor and that proper procedure under criminal law was not followed, rendering the evidence inadmissible and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Mamad Koli, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, Section 65(F), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the panchnama (seizure document), observing that the independent panch witness did not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband liquor and that proper procedure under criminal law was not followed, rendering the evidence inadmissible and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case