Government of Gujarat vs RAMESH MAMAD KOLI — 763/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020012012026

Filing Number

763/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

763/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

46-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205013250729

Police Station

BHUJ TALUKA MANKUVA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH MAMAD KOLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Mamad Koli, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, Section 65(F), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the panchnama (seizure document), observing that the independent panch witness did not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband liquor and that proper procedure under criminal law was not followed, rendering the evidence inadmissible and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Summons - Notice

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 763/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Mamad Koli, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, Section 65(F), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the panchnama (seizure document), observing that the independent panch witness did not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband liquor and that proper procedure under criminal law was not followed, rendering the evidence inadmissible and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case