CHETAN KAMAL TOLANI vs RUPA HUNDALDAS TOLANI — 47/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT020007952025
Filing Number
47/2025
Filing Date
18-Jan-2025
Registration No
47/2025
Registration Date
18-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
46-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHETAN KAMAL TOLANI
Adv. D M JADEJA
-
2.VIJAY KAMAL TOLANI
Adv. D M JADEJA
-
3.PRADEEP KAMAL TOLANI
Adv. D M JADEJA
-
4.DIPESH VISHNU TOLANI
Adv. D M JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUPA HUNDALDAS TOLANI
-
2.RAJESH LAKHMANBHAI CHAD
Adv. A A THACKER
-
3.ICICI BANK(ATMARAM BRANCH)
Adv. R K RUPAREL
-
4.DINESH HINDUJA
-
5.RAJANI HINDUJA
-
6.JAYSHREE HINDUJA
-
7.NEETA HINDUJA
-
8.GAURAV HINDUJA
-
9.ANKIT HINDUJA
-
10.KAMLA KAMAL TOLANI
-
11.NARAIN HUNDALDAS TOLANI
-
12.ARPIT GOBIND TOLANI
-
13.PRITI VISHNU TOLANI
-
14.ANJALI VISHNU TOLANI
-
15.SHANKAR HUNDALDAS TOLANI
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Land Dispute - Temporary Injunction Application (Case No. 47/2025, Bhuj District Court, Gujarat) Outcome: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for a temporary restraining order against defendants from transferring/selling the disputed property (Survey No. 649, 1,49,500 sq.m., Loriya village, Bhuj district). The court found the plaintiffs' ownership claims deficient and the balance of convenience favoring the defendants, particularly ICICI Bank's secured creditor rights under SARFAESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
06-Dec-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
28-Oct-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
04-Oct-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
02-Sep-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
30-Aug-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
21-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
03-May-2025
Summons - Notice
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Mar-2025
Summons - Notice
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Mar-2025
Summons - Notice
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2025
Court Order Summary Case: Land Dispute - Temporary Injunction Application (Case No. 47/2025, Bhuj District Court, Gujarat) Outcome: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for a temporary restraining order against defendants from transferring/selling the disputed property (Survey No. 649, 1,49,500 sq.m., Loriya village, Bhuj district). The court found the plaintiffs' ownership claims deficient and the balance of convenience favoring the defendants, particularly ICICI Bank's secured creditor rights under SARFAESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts