RATANBHAI DHULABHAI VANKAR vs KALIDAS JETHABHAI PANCHAL Advocate - H M JOSHI — 11/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH180004652022

Filing Number

11/2022

Filing Date

21-Apr-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

21-Apr-2022

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATANBHAI DHULABHAI VANKAR

    Adv. B R PATEL

  2. 2.KHATUBHAI DHULABHAI VANKAR

    Adv. B R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALIDAS JETHABHAI PANCHAL Advocate - H M JOSHI

  2. 2.SAVITABEN W/O BHIKHABHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  3. 3.LAVJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  4. 4.GUNVANTBHAI BHIKHABHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  5. 5.KANKUBEN W/O MOHANBHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  6. 6.DHIRUBHAI MOHANBHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  7. 7.NAGINBHAI MOHANBHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  8. 8.ILABEN W/O VISHNUBHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  9. 9.ASHOKBHAI MOHANBHAI PANCHAL

    Adv. H M JOSHI

  10. 10.DIXITKUMAR VISHNUBHAI PANCHAL

  11. 11.MAMLATDAR SHRI KAPADWANJ

    Adv. M R PATEL

  12. 12.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR SHRI KAPADWANJ

    Adv. M R PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCA No. 11/2022 Court Decision: The appellate court allowed the appeal of Ratanbhai and Khatubhai Vankar against the trial court's judgment. The trial court's decision was found to contain serious legal errors and misinterpretation of evidence regarding land ownership rights and access rights. The court set aside the lower court's judgment, which had denied the plaintiffs' claim for a right-of-way to access agricultural land through defendant's property. The appellate court determined the plaintiffs had proven their lawful right to passage through the disputed land for agricultural purposes and that defendants wrongfully obstructed their access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 01-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  13. 11-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  14. 12-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  15. 08-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  16. 21-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  17. 05-Oct-2024

    OrderView PDF

  18. 05-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  19. 23-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  20. 12-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  21. 14-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  22. 05-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  23. 09-Feb-2024

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  24. 15-Dec-2023

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  25. 01-Nov-2023

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  26. 13-Sep-2023

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  27. 02-Aug-2023

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  28. 28-Jun-2023

    For R&P

    Addl. District Judge

  29. 03-May-2023

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  30. 15-Mar-2023

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  31. 08-Feb-2023

    Reply

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 28-Dec-2022

    Reply

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 23-Nov-2022

    Reply

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 12-Oct-2022

    Service Of Process

    3rd Addl District Judge

  35. 07-Sep-2022

    Service Of Process

    3rd Addl District Judge

  36. 29-Jul-2022

    Service Of Process

    3rd Addl District Judge

  37. 01-Jul-2022

    Service Of Process

    3rd Addl District Judge

  38. 13-May-2022

    Service Of Process

    3rd Addl District Judge

  39. 21-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 21-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA No. 11/2022 Court Decision: The appellate court allowed the appeal of Ratanbhai and Khatubhai Vankar against the trial court's judgment. The trial court's decision was found to contain serious legal errors and misinterpretation of evidence regarding land ownership rights and access rights. The court set aside the lower court's judgment, which had denied the plaintiffs' claim for a right-of-way to access agricultural land through defendant's property. The appellate court determined the plaintiffs had proven their lawful right to passage through the disputed land for agricultural purposes and that defendants wrongfully obstructed their access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case