JIGARKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PARMAR vs MUSTAK SALIMBHAI SHEIKH — 792/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH160009292025

Filing Number

792/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

792/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JIGARKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PARMAR

    Adv. N B MAHIDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAK SALIMBHAI SHEIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a check of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued the check as payment but failed to ensure funds were available, thereby committing a criminal offense. The accused was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹1,12,500, and directed to repay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 792/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a check of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued the check as payment but failed to ensure funds were available, thereby committing a criminal offense. The accused was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹1,12,500, and directed to repay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case