JIGARKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PARMAR vs MUSTAK SALIMBHAI SHEIKH — 792/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160009292025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
792/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
792/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JIGARKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PARMAR
Adv. N B MAHIDA
Respondent(s)
MUSTAK SALIMBHAI SHEIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT | |
| 07-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a check of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued the check as payment but failed to ensure funds were available, thereby committing a criminal offense. The accused was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹1,12,500, and directed to repay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a check of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued the check as payment but failed to ensure funds were available, thereby committing a criminal offense. The accused was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹1,12,500, and directed to repay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts