SENVA KANTIBHAI NATUBHAI vs SALIMBHAI ADAMBHAI VHORA Advocate - S K BHAVSAR — 594/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160007052025
Filing Number
594/2025
Filing Date
14-Oct-2025
Registration No
594/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SENVA KANTIBHAI NATUBHAI
Adv. A S SAIYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.SALIMBHAI ADAMBHAI VHORA Advocate - S K BHAVSAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The accused had issued a cheque marked "Fund Insufficient" without legal justification, failed to pay despite proper notice, and provided no valid defense. The court sentenced the accused to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹4,00,000, with additional compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 594/2025
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The accused had issued a cheque marked "Fund Insufficient" without legal justification, failed to pay despite proper notice, and provided no valid defense. The court sentenced the accused to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹4,00,000, with additional compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts