MITABEN MANHARBHAI PATEL vs ASHIKA ASHISHKUMAR PATEL — 5/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61, 314, 316. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 15th April 2026.

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJKH160004482025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5/2025

Filing Date

05-08-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

05-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61, 314, 316

Petitioner(s)

MITABEN MANHARBHAI PATEL

Adv. D K THAKAR

Respondent(s)

ASHIKA ASHISHKUMAR PATEL

GHANSHYAMBHAI JASHUBHAI PANCHAL

NILKABEN SHIRISHBHAI DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

15-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

HEARING

06-04-2026

HEARING

04-04-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
ORDER

Case 5/2025 Summary Petitioner Mitaben Manharbhai Patel filed a private complaint alleging that respondent Nilkaben Shirishbhai Desai, a visa consultant, defrauded her of ₹26 lakhs by promising work permits for Kenya. The petitioner paid ₹15 lakhs in advance through RTGS and cash, with the balance payable upon permit delivery, but the respondents allegedly misappropriated funds and failed to deliver after 2.5 years. The court dismissed the complaint under BNS Section 226, finding insufficient supporting evidence—the petitioner failed to provide bank statements, witness lists, or witness names despite police investigation confirming the transaction occurred in Kenya beyond Indian jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 5/2025 Summary Petitioner Mitaben Manharbhai Patel filed a private complaint alleging that respondent Nilkaben Shirishbhai Desai, a visa consultant, defrauded her of ₹26 lakhs by promising work permits for Kenya. The petitioner paid ₹15 lakhs in advance through RTGS and cash, with the balance payable upon permit delivery, but the respondents allegedly misappropriated funds and failed to deliver after 2.5 years. The court dismissed the complaint under BNS Section 226, finding insufficient supporting evidence—the petitioner failed to provide bank statements, witness lists, or witness names despite police investigation confirming the transaction occurred in Kenya beyond Indian jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VASO All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case