MITABEN MANHARBHAI PATEL vs ASHIKA ASHISHKUMAR PATEL — 5/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61, 314, 316. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 15th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJKH160004482025
Filing Number
5/2025
Filing Date
05-08-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
05-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MITABEN MANHARBHAI PATEL
Adv. D K THAKAR
Respondent(s)
ASHIKA ASHISHKUMAR PATEL
GHANSHYAMBHAI JASHUBHAI PANCHAL
NILKABEN SHIRISHBHAI DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 5/2025 Summary Petitioner Mitaben Manharbhai Patel filed a private complaint alleging that respondent Nilkaben Shirishbhai Desai, a visa consultant, defrauded her of ₹26 lakhs by promising work permits for Kenya. The petitioner paid ₹15 lakhs in advance through RTGS and cash, with the balance payable upon permit delivery, but the respondents allegedly misappropriated funds and failed to deliver after 2.5 years. The court dismissed the complaint under BNS Section 226, finding insufficient supporting evidence—the petitioner failed to provide bank statements, witness lists, or witness names despite police investigation confirming the transaction occurred in Kenya beyond Indian jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 5/2025 Summary Petitioner Mitaben Manharbhai Patel filed a private complaint alleging that respondent Nilkaben Shirishbhai Desai, a visa consultant, defrauded her of ₹26 lakhs by promising work permits for Kenya. The petitioner paid ₹15 lakhs in advance through RTGS and cash, with the balance payable upon permit delivery, but the respondents allegedly misappropriated funds and failed to deliver after 2.5 years. The court dismissed the complaint under BNS Section 226, finding insufficient supporting evidence—the petitioner failed to provide bank statements, witness lists, or witness names despite police investigation confirming the transaction occurred in Kenya beyond Indian jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts